If our very own government were behind the events of September 11, 2001, as the evidence seems to point, then what possible motive would they have? Such a question begs a certain degree of naiveté and ingnorance of history that is difficult for me to fathom.

"The cabal of war fanatics advising the White House secretly planned a 'transformation' of defense policy years ago, calling for war against Iraq and huge increases in military spending. A “catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor”—was seen as necessary to bring this about."- Christopher Bollyn, American Free Press

A neo-conservative Washington-based organization known as the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), funded by three foundations closely tied to Persian Gulf oil and weapons and defense industries, drafted the war plan for U.S. global domination through military power.

“We need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future...”

The 90-page PNAC document from September 2000 says: “The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.”

“The process of transformation,” the plan said, “is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor.”

You see, the plan for the invasion of Iraq and the implimentation of the Patriot Act were formulated before the events of 9-11. 9-11 did not necessitate these actions, but was the excuse for implementing them. Why?

There is no more profitble business, no better means for controlling resources, and no greater method for consolidating power than war. President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned of the unprecidented march of the "military-industrial complex," and he has proven prophetic.

We have been fighting many wars over the past century, but truth be told, we have fought none of them for ourselves. We have found ourselves crisscrossing the globe, invading this country and that country for seemingly no reason, if we go by our history books and televisions. But if we go by the actual historical record, and not just by what we have been told the historical record is by the propaganda matrix extablished by the powers that be, then we can paint quite a different picture. I have heard America referred to as an empire, but we are the foot soldiers for the empire and not the empire itself.


As Congressman Ron Paul has termed them, a group of Machiavellian "Neo-Cons" have taken over our government. They seek the profits of war, oil and drugs, and they have been reaping these profits, through the same methods and under many guises, for over a hundred years. The Spanish-American War, WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, the Cold War, both Gulf Wars, and Afghanistan have all been contrived and phony wars fought for their profit and gain.

"Ulterior motives have always played a part in the foreign policies of almost every Nation throughout history. Economic gain and a geographic expansion, or even just the desires for more political power, too often drives the militarism of all nations. Unfortunately, in recent years, we have not been exempt. If expansionism, economic interests, desires for hegemony and influential allies affect our policies, and they in turn incite mob attacks against us, they obviously cannot be ignored. The target will be elusive and ever-enlarging rather than vanquished."-- Ron Paul

Vietnam, we witnessed the blatantly phony and contrived Gulf of Tonkin incident; WWI, we were manipulated by the Royal Crown into fighting this war for their benefit and gain, and then fronted the cost; WWII, it took an attack on Pearl Harbor, which was provoked by the hawkish and Crown-controlled FDR administration, and was known about in advance. In effect, they let it happen in order to draw us into yet another European conflict on behalf of the Crown, who was manipulating both sides (Wall Street and the international banking community financed Hitler and Stalin.) Again, we fronted the costs of this war, i.e., we were placed on the hook to the Crown (bankers) for the war debts (this is the business of war.) Cold War, Iraq, etc., have all been contrived for the Crown's benefit. In effect, America has become a money laundering enterprise for her Crown war machine; we fight and pay for the wars and they reap all of the benefits. Not the typical fanfare taught us by our government schools.

War profiteering has always been the international banking communities cup of tea, but the first Gulf War took corporate war profiteering to a whole new level, as various companies were contracted at unprecidented levels by our government to build infrastructure and perform a myriad of what used to be military functions. Most of Bush's cabinet, and their lucrative fortunes, are affiliated with this racket in some way.

Control of Middle Eastern oil resources, and their profits, have been cemented by both Gulf Wars, as the oil industry has never had it so good.

"According to the two authors, the economic conditions demanded by the U.S. were turned down and led to U.S. military threats against the Taliban. It has been known for years that UniCal, a U.S. company, has been anxious to build a pipeline through northern Afghanistan. But it has not been possible due to the weak Afghan central government. We should not be surprised now that many contend that the plan for the U.N. to nation-build in Afghanistan is a logical and important consequence of this desire. The crisis has merely given those interested in this project an excuse to replace the government of Afghanistan."-- Congressman Ron Paul

With Vietnam, the Golden Triangle drug trade was consolidated under their control, as we witnessed the unprecidented smuggling of illegal drugs in and out of this country throughout the 80's.

And now, since our takeover in 2001, we have seen an unprecidented boom in the opium/heroin racket in Afghanistan, as they completely dominate the market. Nearly 100 percent of all opium now comes from Afghanistan under Crown control.

What do I mean by "Crown"? It is the myriad of international banking interests, and their agents, that control the governments of the world, largely based in "the City" within London.

"Neo-conservatism has been around for decades and, strangely, has connections to past generations as far back as Machiavelli. Modern-day neo-conservatism was introduced to us in the 1960s. It entails both a detailed strategy as well as a philosophy of government. The ideas of Teddy Roosevelt, and certainly Woodrow Wilson, were quite similar to many of the views of present-day neocons. Neocon spokesman Max Boot brags that what he advocates is “hard Wilsonianism.” In many ways, there’s nothing “neo” about their views, and certainly nothing conservative. Yet they have been able to co-op the conservative movement by advertising themselves as a new or modern form of conservatism.

More recently, the modern-day neocons have come from the far left, a group historically identified as former Trotskyists. Liberal Christopher Hitchins, has recently officially joined the neocons, and it has been reported that he has already been to the White House as an ad hoc consultant. Many neocons now in positions of influence in Washington can trace their status back to Professor Leo Strauss of the University of Chicago. One of Strauss’ books was Thoughts on Machiavelli. This book was not a condemnation of Machiavelli’s philosophy. Paul Wolfowitz actually got his PhD under Strauss. Others closely associated with these views are Richard Perle, Eliot Abrams, Robert Kagan and William Kristol. All are key players in designing our new strategy of preemptive war. Others include: Michael Ledeen of the American Enterprise Institute; former CIA Director James Woolsy; Bill Bennett of Book of Virtues fame; Frank Gaffney; Dick Cheney; and Donald Rumsfeld. There are just too many to mention who are philosophically or politically connected to the neocon philosophy in some varying degree."-- Ron Paul

As I have stated before, war is the greatest racket on earth. Billions are spent every year on weapons, troops, etc., but there is another benefit that war creates for the elite: dollar hegemony. The fact remains that our very own economic health depends on war and its spoils in the form of dollar dominance. Since the printing of fiat money is nothing more than counterfeiting, the issuer must maintain a modicum of control over the currency. Oil and all of the major resources must be linked to it, and trade markets must depend on it. If you have paid attention, most of the goods in this country are foreign-made. Our economy is built upon the labor and the credit of others. When we have gone too long without a war in order to bolster credit and control over the rest of the globe, our economy starts a downward spiral. Like Rome of old, we must exact tribute from the conquered for our survival. The economic data over the past two hundred years suggests that with every economic downturn (30's, 60's, 70's, 90's, 2000's) a war will coincide. Is this a coincidence, or by design?


Larry Silverstein, owner of the lease on the World Trade Center Complex on 9-11, took out an insurance policy on the Complex only months before the attacks. He is now seeking 7.2 billion dollars in compensation for his losses on that day, Incidentally, only buildings belonging to Silverstein were demolished on 9-11. Other surrounding buildings that were uninsured by Silverstein, suffered only minor damage, and, of course, never collapsed. Any building that was not owned by Silverstein Properties that day strangely remained upright, despite being a lot closer to the two towers that collapsed onto them. Why would he wait until seven weeks before the attacks to lease the Complex, when he and his comglomerate had been controlling the Complex for years?

It was well known, before the 9-11 attacks, that the Port Authority that owned the WTC desperately wanted to demolish the out-dated Twin Towers, but doing so would prove almost impossible under conventional means because of the asbestos used as insulation throughout the Structures. To demolish these monuments in a conventional manner would expose a greater part of Manhattan Island to poisonous gas and concrete dust (a possible legal nightmare.) The buildings were in desperate need of expensive renovation and costly to keep up. Clearing these dinosaurs would open this prime realestate to new lucrative building projects. Silverstein, and his business partners, have broken ground on the new "Freedom Tower" below.

(Larry Silverstein and his cronies with their eye on the prize)

Project Northwoods

According to recently released, long hidden documents, the JCS drew up and had approved plans for what may be the most corrupt and insidious operation in the history of the US Government. These plans, code-named OPERATION NORTHWOODS, put a haunting perspective behind the September 11th 2001 events. They proposed launching a secret and violent war of terrorism against their own country in order to condition the people of the USA into supporting an intended war against Cuba. These sickening plans called for innocent American civilians to be shot, for Cuban refugees to be blown up, for violent and continued acts of terrorism to be perpetrated in major American cities, for innocents to be framed for bombings, and for planes to be hijacked. All of these things would then be blamed on Fidel Castro and Cuba, thus inciting hatred for him and Communism, and instigating the public backing that the JCS needed as an excuse to launch the pre-planned war. This all sounds just too chillingly familiar in the current climate when we think of the WTC bombing in 1993, the Murrah bombing and McVeigh, Flight TWA 800 (which it appears we may have just seen a reconstruction of), the hijackings of September 11th and the inciting of hatred for Osama Bin Laden without any evidence that he carried out the attacks. (The mass  media has always been an invaluable source of propaganda for the government and is even more so now as both parties have so much more to gain financially and in terms of authority, by operating in this way). source

Insider Trading

FTW, December 6, 2001 -- On October 9th, FTW broke a story on insider trading connected to the 9-11 attacks on the World Trade Center that sparked worldwide controversy. In that story we reported how the Israeli Herzliyya Institute for Counterterrorism had documented that unknown individuals -- with accurate foreknowledge of the attacks -- had purchased an obvious and unusually large number of "put" options on United and American Airlines shortly before the attacks. source